Internet dating addiction research
Although less physically attractive people were the most likely to choose a self-enhancing photo, overall the differences were tiny.The lab photos were only a little less attractive than those chosen for online dating profiles (about 5% for women and 4% for men). Clues to which types of profile photos work come from one online dating site which has analysed 7,000 photographs in its database (oktrends, 2010): (Remember, these are all associations so we can’t be sure about causality.) Even amongst a diverse population of online daters, people still prefer someone who is similar to themselves.While the results were more variable, overall people preferred relatively low-levels of self-disclosure.For many, but not all internet daters, the aim is to meet someone new in the flesh. (2008) found that 51% of people had made a face-to-face date within one week and one month of receiving replies to their online overtures. It’s only after this stage is complete that people can get to know each other.
In this respect online dating is no different from offline dating.
As expected women tended to shave off the pounds, while men gave themselves a boost in height.
These lies make little difference in the real world because the vast majority of fibbing would have been difficult to detect in person.
These studies found no evidence that people use online dating because they can’t hack it face-to-face. People’s motivations to start online dating are many and various, typically involving a triggering event like a break-up, but overall Barraket and Henry-Waring (2008) have found that people’s motivations are less individual and more social.
People aren’t using online dating because they are shy but because they have moved to a new city, are working long hours or don’t have time to meet anyone new.
Search for internet dating addiction research:
The authors argue that it is changing the face of marriage by bring together types of people who previously never would have met.